Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Week 2 Written Assignment ( case studies)

Week 2  Written Assignment ( case studies)

Q Q.1 Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment. Q. 2 Should the intent or motive behind Lewiston’s conduct be considered when deciding sexual harassment activities? Explain.Q.3 If you were the district’s EEOC officer, what would you conclude? What disciplinary action, if any, would you take? Case Study 2 Q. 1 What advantages did Lockheed Martin gain by using virtual teams? Explain.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

The EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) has defined the sexual harassment as it does not have to be of sexually developed, however can include provocative remark about a person’s sex. It is completely against the law to harass an individual because of that person’s sex. There are two kinds of sexual harassment in EEOC, Quid Pro Quo and Hostile Work Environment. Quid Pro Quo is a kind of sexual harassment in which some kind of employment benefit is given in exchange for sexual favors of some kind.